Iowa Voices: Political Violence

Political violence isn’t symmetrical. It’s escalating on the left, and political leaders must  call it out 

By: Jeff Kaufmann - Chairman, Republican Party of Iowa 

We keep hearing calls to “encourage thoughtful discourse” and “discourage violent  rhetoric.” That’s true, and I have. One political party keeps crossing the line, pretending both  parties are equally responsible. In fact, the recent surge in political violence is coming  overwhelmingly from the left. If leaders want to promote civility, they need to start with the  truth. The truth is that the left has a violence problem.  

According to data from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, left-wing  terrorist attacks and plots in the U.S. are on the rise. In fact, left-wing incidents reached their  highest levels in decades, surpassing those from the far right. (CSIS)  

That doesn’t mean violence from the right should be excused. It shouldn’t. But we can’t  build “thoughtful discourse” on top of false equivalence.  

A quick look at what’s recently been happening:  

- In Virginia, a Democrat candidate for Attorney General openly threatened violence  against his Republican opponent and his children.  

- Sitting members of Congress on the left have flirted with or outright encouraged  political violence.  

- There have been two attempted assassinations of President Trump, an attempted  mass shooting of Republican members of Congress that nearly killed Steve Scalise, the  assassination of Charlie Kirk, and even the assassination of a major health-care executive, all  tied to left-wing extremists. What’s worse, all of these have been celebrated by many on the  left, after the fact.  

That’s not just threats or talk.  

Here’s how political leaders, particularly Democrats, should respond.  

1. Call it out, directly and by name.  

When violence or violent rhetoric comes from your own side, say so. Don’t hide behind  buzzwords like “both sides” or “extremists everywhere.” That’s political cowardice. Leadership  means naming the problem even when it’s uncomfortable.  

2. Stop glamorizing outrage.  

Too many Democrats treat the loudest, angriest activists as heroes. Social media mobs  are rewarded, not rebuked. Political leaders should draw a clear line between passionate  advocacy and violent threats, and stop pretending rage is a virtue.  

3. Lead with example, not excuses.  

You don’t de-escalate violence by winking at it. Too many political leaders, especially on  the left, are afraid of offending the radicals in their own ranks. They tiptoe around the problem  instead of confronting it. And every time they look the other way, the temperature rises a little  higher.  

Civility isn’t weakness, it’s strength. We can highlight the differences between  candidates, records, and political party platforms, without calling for the utter demise of our  opponents. But it only works if both sides play by the same rules.  

If Democrats truly want to discourage violence, they need to start by cleaning up their  own house. They need to condemn their own radicals as forcefully as they condemn everyone  else’s.  

Otherwise, all the talk about “thoughtful discourse” is just that, talk. Because thoughtful  discourse doesn’t coexist with threats and intimidation.  

Political Violence is on the Rise. It’s Up to Us to Cool the Rhetoric  

Violent rhetoric can not be allowed to become mainstream in American politics

By: Rita Hall - Chair, Iowa Democratic Party 

Why can’t we all just get along? This country is subjected to enough political violence  every year to make any sane nation reach a breaking point. We can’t stand idly by as killings  and terror become normal in America. Each and every one of us should be doing something to  bring Americans together as fellow Americans.  

It is so easy to become caught up in the us versus them, Republican versus Democrat,  left versus right, liberal versus conservative mindset. Advertisements that fill our television  screens and mailboxes all claim that candidates and parties are “fighting” for you or “fighting”  for certain priorities.  

At some point, politics became less about who would be a good candidate to fairly  represent the beliefs of their constituents and more about who is the lesser of two evils. The  truth is that candidates for public office are rarely evil and nearly always just humans who have  been called to public service in a very hostile and divided time in our nation.  

No one has all the answers on how we can fix violent rhetoric, but it is obvious to me  that each of us must start with our own reactions. We must hold ourselves and our elected  officials accountable when it comes to using divisive and violent rhetoric.  

That is especially true on social media, where it is so easy to for anyone and everyone  to react immediately and often without enough forethought and judgment. It is easy to hide  behind a fake or private social media account and say things you wouldn’t normally say if you  were speaking to someone person.  

Social media has become unbelievably powerful because it works. It impacts others.  Words typed out of hate, desperation, or sadness can easily be picked up and shared  thousands of times online. Even if an account is private, it’s easy to copy and paste posts until  they are shared a million times or more. There’s a reason we say it’s “gone viral”. The question  is – is that virus making things better or worse? Is it intended to inform and create positive  change or is it designed to incite the hatred and violence that is threatening our very existence  as a community, state, country, or nation?  

When writing these social media posts, it’s important to remember that we are talking to  real people, about other real people and about emotional issues that have real impacts on  people’s lives.  

I ask myself: “Would you print that thought in your local newspaper with your name next  to it? If not, don’t put it online. Share it with your best friend instead.”  

In fact, let’s all make an effort to do more by talking to friends, family, and neighbors  about the issues that are important to us. One of the reasons divisive online rhetoric has  become more acceptable is because we have stopped talking to people who disagree. Let’s all  work on our ability to listen and to be curious about someone else’s opinion.  

Seek first to understand before seeking to be understood. Never use language that  promotes political violence, and tell others that type of language is not acceptable. We can  hold elected officials accountable in so many ways that are so much more effective than violent  talk or action.  

Most elected officials have websites that include their contact information. Call their  offices, send them an email, or a handwritten letter that details your concerns. Contact your  county political parties, join a protest, or show up to local political events and make your voice  heard. Visit iwillvote.com and make a plan to vote on Election Day.  

Don’t let yourself fall into that ‘us versus them’ trap, and remember we aren’t at war  with ‘the other side.’ We are all trying to make a safer and more prosperous nation for our  children and our grandchildren.  

The best patriotic and most American way we can build a better country is by  negotiating, compromising when it makes sense, and standing up for our values and beliefs  through the rights given to us by the Constitution.